Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 29.06.2025 01:47
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Let’s just make it real clear:
How much stronger is an average man than an average woman?
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Trump is forcing this dirty, costly coal plant to stay open - The Washington Post
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Consumer sentiment swings sharply higher in June as tariff anxiety recedes - Axios
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Magic Johnson Bluntly Blames Two Players for Knicks' Season-Ending Loss - Sports Illustrated
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Google quietly released an app that lets you download and run AI models locally - TechCrunch
Thank you.
What’s next?
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
What is after school detention like in your school?
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.